We can get a significant dermal exposure to a toxicant from having exposed
skin in contact with that toxicant in ambient air. I am not talking about splashing or the
settling of mist onto the skin, the mode of exposure discussed in this blog is
pure vapor in air-to-skin-to-systemic absorption.
This manner of exposure can
become very important when the respiratory route is reasonably well guarded via
the use of a respirator.
The classic example of this type of exposure is phenol which
has a relatively low exposure limit indicating that it is quite toxic via
inhalation. It is also
quite irritating to the respiratory tract and thus may provide some good warning
indications of exposure via that route. Thus, folks who have to work in environments
at greater than the OEL (ACGIH TLV and OSHA PEL = 5 ppm as an 8 hour time weighted
average) would almost certainly be using respirators.
Phenol also readily penetrates the skin and, again, I believe
dermal exposure to liquid phenol placed or splashed onto the skin surface would
be very irritating or even corrosive.
A more subtitle route of exposure is as vapor molecules
going from the air above the skin, into the skin and then through the stratum
corneum and dermis to be systemically absorbed. This presents a real problem to the Industrial Hygienist
trying to evaluate or estimate this exposure potential.
One method would be to put absorbent patches on the skin to be subsequently desorbed and analyzed. These could provide a measure of the weight per square centimeter to which the skin was exposed. Multiply this weight by the total amount of exposed skin for at least some measure of what the exposure might be.
One method would be to put absorbent patches on the skin to be subsequently desorbed and analyzed. These could provide a measure of the weight per square centimeter to which the skin was exposed. Multiply this weight by the total amount of exposed skin for at least some measure of what the exposure might be.
Other than involving a lot of logistics and laboratory
development, the above method has the problem of being done AFTER the fact of
exposure. What we need is a method that
is prospective; this is, before and predictive of the exposure.
I have discussed Dr. Wil ten Berge’s work before here. He developed SKINPERM which has been around
for a long time and, working with Daniel Drolet, Rosalie Tibaldi and Tom
Armstrong, has produced the more recent, more user-friendly IHSkinperm model. The basic modeling engine that Wil developed
is the only one I know of that will take the airborne concentration of a
chemical (along with other physical-chemical properties) and estimate the
dermal exposure potential of that chemical to exposed skin.
You can find SKINPERM on Wil’s website: http://home.wxs.nl/~wtberge/qsarperm.html In addition to the model, Wil has a wealth of educational material on dermal exposure on this web site that has been around serving the risk assessment community for some time. Put “IHSkinperm” into Google and the first two hits are the manual and the spreadsheet.
You can find SKINPERM on Wil’s website: http://home.wxs.nl/~wtberge/qsarperm.html In addition to the model, Wil has a wealth of educational material on dermal exposure on this web site that has been around serving the risk assessment community for some time. Put “IHSkinperm” into Google and the first two hits are the manual and the spreadsheet.
Unless someone is wearing well-fitted vapor barrier
clothing, you might want to give some consideration to the possibility that even
skin ostensibly covered with cloth clothing is at least somewhat “exposed” to
vapors. Considering the person naked
(about 2 m2 of skin) would represent a worst case or bounding
condition for these estimates.
It is the Holiday Season and I would like to take this
opportunity to wish everyone reading this, along with their loved-ones, according to their preference, a Merry Christmas, Happy Hanukah, or whatever holiday you observe including the Return
of the Sun during this special time of year.
No comments:
Post a Comment